The How to Support Teaching and Learning using your Student Outcomes Data category focuses on integrating monitoring and evaluation activities with other aspects of educational programming to foster a cycle of continuous improvement. The resources are primarily aimed at staff, partner MERL/T&S staff, teachers, and school leadership and are applicable across all educational stages.
A key aspect of this category is the use of monitoring, evaluation, research, and learning (MERL) to inform teaching and learning practices. The "Teaching and Learning Programmatic Cycle" visualizes how MERL is situated within the broader programmatic cycle, from setting a vision for student success to program improvement. The "Teaching as Collective Leadership Observation & Debrief Tool" is designed to help teachers reflect on the connections between their actions and student outcomes.
The resources also emphasize the importance of a Theory of Change in program design and evaluation. Resources like "Theory of Change Basics" and "Theory of Change: Methodological briefs" provide guidance on developing a clear and logical framework that explains how program activities are expected to lead to desired outcomes.
These resources aim to break down silos and ensure that data and insights from MERL are used to drive improvements across all functions of an educational organization.
This category provides the strategic "glue" that holds the entire MERL cycle together. It offers frameworks and concepts to ensure that monitoring and evaluation are not siloed activities, but are deeply integrated into the fabric of program design, implementation, and organizational learning.
What This Category Offers:
-
Programmatic Cycle Frameworks: The "Teaching and Learning Programatic Cycle" provides a powerful visualization of how MERL fits into a continuous improvement cycle, from setting a student vision to programmatic improvement.
-
Theory of Change (ToC) Guidance: This category features essential, evidence-based guides on developing a Theory of Change. Resources like "Theory of Change Basics" explain how to articulate the causal pathways that link your activities to your ultimate goals, which is fundamental for both program planning and evaluation.
-
Tools for Reflective Practice: It includes tools that connect MERL directly to professional practice. The "Teaching as Collective Leadership Observation & Debrief Tool" helps teachers and leaders see the connection between actions and outcomes. The "Definition of Fellow Competencies and Rubric" shows how MERL can align with and inform human resources and teacher development.
How to Leverage This Category's Utility:
-
For Leadership & MERL Staff: Use the Theory of Change resources when designing any new program or intervention. This forces clarity on goals, assumptions, and the logic of the program, which makes monitoring more meaningful. The programmatic cycle can be used as a communication tool for all staff.
-
For All Users: These resources help shift the mindset from viewing MERL as a reporting burden to seeing it as a collective learning process that drives improvement for everyone.
Linkages to Other Categories: This category is the central connector that integrates the other three.
-
It provides the overarching structure for the entire process, starting with the vision from How to Prioritize Student Outcomes.
-
It ensures that the activities in How to Monitor Student Outcomes are purposeful and aligned with the program's logic.
-
It creates the systems and feedback loops necessary to ensure that the findings from What to do with your Monitoring Data lead to tangible action and learning, thus completing the cycle.